Late last night two titans of online
film criticism grappled in a candid but civil
Twitter debate about the
eroding ethical state of showbiz journalism.
I’ve been reading both Devin Faraci of
Badass Digest and Drew McWeeny of
HitFix on a near-daily basis for the better part of a decade.
They’re among the best web critics currently working; always insightful,
articulate and passionate. They are the giant shoulders upon which I stand.
The discussion was sparked when
Faraci sent out a tweet to his 10,000+ subscribers, lamenting a growing trend that finds junket critics selling out themselves and their faithful readers. “So few of your favorite film critics are
trustworthy. What a state of affairs when opinions are for sale. “
Faraci was referencing a
Paramount Pictures press conference, held earlier in the day, for
Sacha Baron Cohen’s new
comedy,
The Dictator. Journalists were inexplicably required to
submit questions for approval beforehand.
Cohen proceeded to field the questions in-character, as Gaddafi-composite Admiral General Aladeen, of the fictional
Republic of Wadiya. Faraci's concern was that attending journalists became complicit participants in a shameless PR
stunt masquerading as a legitimate press conference.
A carefully considered Professor
X vs. Magneto polemic unfolded between Faraci and McWeeny (I’ll let you
determine who’s who). They agreed upon the core ethical dilemma, that truth and honesty are fundamental to their profession, but disagreed on how a responsible
journalist should react to offending parties. Both
gentlemen asked tough questions in what emerged as one the most intelligent discourses on journalistic integrity I've read in ages.
The following is a transcript,
from May 8th, 2012, of the Twitter conversation between Faraci and
McWeeny.